Russia, Syria, Hezbollah and the Iran... A hypothesis

We look at the issue of Syria and the related associated as follows:
If Syria the Hezbollah and vice versa supported, and the Iran Syria with arms and troops of the Iranian revolutionary guards, the IRGC, - then is nothing new. What context neaher should consider is that move from Russia.

If so the Iran, Syria and the Hezbollah deal together against Syrian rebels, which is very logic.
If however, there is a collaboration against Israel, and we must assume this after Israel already has attacked Damascus and the military research center in Jamraya, 100 km north of Damascus, to prevent arms sales on the part of Iran to Hezbollah...

Now follows the logical question how far is Russia connected in this context? First, we must hold, that Russia is the closest confidante of Syria and without Russia, a military intervention of the US, or a no-fly zone was enforced, like in Libya the case it was. If so, Russia is familiar with all things they happen in Syria, then Russia must have knowledge from Iranian arms sales to Syria, respectively on the Hezbollah.

We should expect from the hypothesis.

Now we need to open the context and ask after the acceptance to. What justifies this, if it is a fact. Also, we know that the Hezbollah, Israel rather today than tomorrow would attack their enemy, but not will do, as long as the Iran is not attacked by Israel!?

There is the question whether Russia has knowledge thereof, and if yes, whether it the proceed of Iran to the Hezbollah or the proceed which enemies both approves against Israel?

We go a few steps further, and calculate the worst case for Israel. The Hezbollah has all the weapons they need to attack Israel, and does so, adopted after Israel attack the Iran for example, or Israel attack Syria and Syria defend themselves. Then must however Russia as a partner of Syria, also called partner Hezbollah can occur, or?

If so Israel attacked Syria once again with air force, and Syria as previously announced, with all funds defended - what happens then? Hezbollah, Israel is attacked? If so - then the Iran is with in the game. We take it from that then the US and Israel fight together against Syria, or have a reason to attack the Iran. If Russia is aware of all of the link, it will take up first on the side of Syria and then on the side of the Iran. The result calls Worldwar!

The Israel trial (Part. 1: Damascus Attack)

My certain calls according to the Israel Government, owed to speak, to condemn them to a  war against the Iranian Republic.

I refer to G'd the Almighty, in my judgment. I call him as a witness over my head, to appoint me to obtain the evidence against Israel.

The indications are not observed, they mix my view of the case or the object. The fact is well of the claim due to heavy violation against the live.

The, which called against Israel, I call them on the agenda in the case against Israel, to charge them for inhuman activities.

The offence:

Israel carried out early on Sunday a missile attack on a military research center outside the Syrian capital, Damascus agency SANA reported.

...
[*-18reg.1/ "... the western countrys doesn't condem "Damascus attack" as an violation of UN rules. This makes them complicit!"]

The Iranian defense minister said  that the United States had given Israel the green light to carry out airstrikes on Syria.

“The Zionist regime’s attack on Syria, which was carried out with a green light from the United States, revealed the connection between the mercenary terrorists (in Syria) and their supporters and the regime occupying al-Quds (Jerusalem),” Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi said.

“The inhumane actions and acts of adventurism of the Zionist regime in the region will inflame anti-Zionist sentiments and will shorten the life of this fake regime,” Vahidi said, adding, “Such desperate acts are not indicative of power, but rather they show the desperation and confusion of this regime in the face of regional developments.”

Such malevolent acts would endanger security in the entire region, he said.

[*17-Brig.1: source: Tehran Times]

Syria condemned Israel over airstrikes against targets around Damascus, saying the attacks aim "to give direct military support to terrorist groups" fighting the government, the Associated Press reported.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry also said Sunday in a letter sent to the United Nations and the U.N. Security Council that the "Israeli aggression" had killed and wounded several people and "caused widespread destruction."

Israel-i attack on Syria, targets at the weekend killed at least 42 soldiers, a watchdog said.

_________________________________________ Syrian president threatens to start war with Israel _________________________________________ Syrian President Bashar al-Assad sent a letter to Washington through Moscow, stating that he will start a war with Israel, should it make another attack on Syrian territory, Interfax reports. Assad said that he will wait for a response for 24 hours.

The applicant have the words:

Algeria on Sunday expressed strong condemnation of the Israeli aggression on Syrian sites, stressing that the attack is a flagrant violation of the international law and the sovereignty of an Arab state.

In the same context, Lebanese Minister of Foreign and Expatriates Affairs, Adnan Mansour, condemned the Zionist aggression on the scientific research center in Jamraya in Damascus Countryside, describing it as "a dangerous act that aims to blow up the region."

"Once again the Israeli entity of terrorism carries out a new aggression on Syria using false pretexts to justify this barbarous aggression," said Mansour.

In a statement issued by his press office, Lebanese President Michel Sleiman denounced the Israeli attacks on sites in Syria, saying that such behavior isn't unusual for an enemy whose policy is based on aggression and who exploited the current circumstances in Syria to carry out its attacks, just like it did in Lebanon in its times of difficulty.

The Sudanese government's spokesman, Minister of Culture and Media Information Ahmad Bilal Othman, affirmed that the Israeli aggression on sites in Syria constitutes an aggression against the entire Arab nation.

[*16Int.4/3: source: SANA]

"The (UN) secretary-general spoke by telephone with" ElAraby, according to a readout issued here by Ban's spokesman. " They shared their grave concern about the reported airstrikes in Syria and the risks for regional security," it added. [*2rep.O2: source: Xinhua.net]

Indicative facts:

>Syria: FM sent a letter to the United Nations and the UN Security Council that the Israeli aggression had "caused widespread destruction.

>‘Israel used depleted uranium shells in air strike’ – Syrian source:

For Bashar al-Assad

All against Bashar al-Assad?
What gives? Imperialists attacking Syrian people for a fair policy?
What was and is - war has prevented never existing conditions!

WAR AND PEACE... the truth against lies and mind!  Invincible future - never conceived - Bashar and Russia - like a ship - full speed ahead! 

What have we done to you? Have we  not the best agents - the old Russians around the world?  Teach?  You want to water then we - Chinese – all alone?  Dont tell me a capitalist!

Capitalism is contempt '! Where are the enemies of Bashar al-Assad - show yourselves! Only when you will show you we raise our sword against you – show me your sword!

The past and the present, determine the running things - the truth! Tell me of your democracy--reports me from your past and your present! are cowardly capitalists – nothing has it! We own you! Your debts range up in the sky!
When and how do you pay your debts - with blood?

For a peaceful solution in Syria?

Author : Branichild (FB)

For the Syrian National Congress (SNC), is it more difficult even just to make a point plus in the near future.

After today's bilateral talks  in Berlin by Russian  FM Sergej Lavrov and his counterpart John Kerry, working on a peaceful solution within the Syrian crisis in bilateral talks, the two top diplomats discussed how to implement the so-called “Geneva Agreement” aimed at getting the Syrian government and the opposition to plan a transitional government for the time after Syrian President Bashar al-Assad steps down, the AP reported.

The 23 months lasting war between the Syrian army under Bashar al-Assad and the Free Syrian Army, they cause no real initiative of individual agitation, neither military nor political, however, Bashar al-Assad  which recognize to give is ready to discuss with all the parties in the crisis for a peaceful solution, after new elections in an legitimate Syria, elected by President Bashar al-Assad, with conditions for ceasefire negotiations.

The Syrian National Congress, under Moaz al-Kathib, formed in Doha last year, will already  attend The friends of the Syrian people International Working Group meeting (IWG), with 53 participating countrys in Rome, including three international organizations, during its sixth meeting here on Tuesday called for enhancing punitive measures against Syrian President Bashar Al Assad.

the upcoming meeting of the Syrian opposition in Rome [in protest against a lack of international condemnation of the "crimes committed against the Syrian people in (Aleppo)].

"It seems that extremists who bet on an armed solution to the Syrian problem have prevailed in the ranks of the opposition at this time, including the so-called (Syrian) National Coalition, blocking all initiatives that could lead to the start of dialogue," Lavrov told reporters in Moscow.

"In our contacts with other countries that can influence the parties in Syria, we have noticed a growing understanding of the need to influence both the government and, first of all, the opposition so that they do not come up with unrealistic requests as preconditions for the start of dialogue," Lavrov said after talks with Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans.

In this context of which go ahead after  John Kerry was in a meeting with his counterpart Sergej Lavrov in Berlin,... turns the question after, wy Moaz al-Khatib, a friend of the FSA removes any basis for negotiations with President Bashar al-Assad, after  the SAA  attacks positions of the FSA in Aleppo and the car bombing in Damascus, if 53 humans, including many children, have lost her life.

“Regarding Syria, the most important thing is that we confirmed our mutual understanding that the continuation of violence is unacceptable,” Lavrov said.

SANA News Agency :

"We hope the Syrian opposition would express support for dialogue as it issued conflicting statements in this regard, we hope the opposition would not only support dialogue, but also nominate its team for negotiations," the Russian Today TV site quoted the Russian Minister as telling reporters following the meeting.

"It seems that extremists…have prevailed in the ranks of the opposition at this time, including the so-called National Coalition, blocking all initiatives that could lead to the start of dialogue," Lavrov was quoted as saying by Russia Today website.

Tactical and temporary was the Damascus Bombing "excellent" placed, to torpid the negotiations between the SNC and Bashar al-Assad's government.

The Western has failed into subtil Terrorism

When a rat is sitting in a corner and must see here's enemy from there, - she can go you through the pants. Better, three or four hit the rat death!
Better yet, you catch the rat and wait until her friends heard she shout ...
Then can the proud Syrian Arab Army better answering (Tunisia, Lebanon, Algeria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, China, Iran reply, and to advrse pressure against UN structure.)
The time change and so the proportions of thepower!
The West has failed completely -terrorists are our grandchildren call him and it spit on their soil, and just like it FSA / SSG, ect do now in Syria. We remember the
rat at the back and think it's not a rat , but how many in Syria. This what we do best , it is to believe they are free to make and use them as prisoners - kill one after the other.
Your cry is always later and the other rats must helps...
If I say the West has lost his face in context Syrian strategy - it must also be asked whether and how this can still represent the Humanism, which is developed by Europe and U.S. in the past.
Are we not submit a change of Paradigms?
I think the western states are well aware that Islam, with its wide and its facets as the Sunni, Shiites, Sufis ect to use against each other.

Important is the question of whether Islam is more radical ( AlQaida ) , or along the lines of Iran ( NAM / Egypt (Copt) goes on the road of Solidarity .